Page 122 - Constitution
P. 122

70       Years of Indian                                                                                                                                             Years of Indian

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Constitution
                                                                        Constitution


                                                                                         In its path breaking judgment in M. Siddiq
               its activist approach, the Court has not hesitated to step in
               and strike down certain provisions of the Indian Penal Code               v. Mahant Suresh Das”, better known as the
               (criminalizing homosexuality and aultery) as being violative of           Ayodhya case, the Supreme Court put to

               Articles 10 (1984) 3 SCC 161 "(1984)2 SCC 244 12 (1997) 6                 rest a centuries old dispute, recognising
               SCC 241 13 (2017) 9 SCC1 14, 15, 19 and 21, in Navtej Singh               the right of the deity of Lord Ram over the
               Johar v. Union of Indi ł4 and Joseph Shine v. Union of India's.           property believed to be the birthplace.
                  Its judgment in Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State
               of Kerala”, allowing young women to enter the Sabarimala
                                                                                     of different communities in order to do complete justice.
               temple, led to filing of a review petition wherein certain questions
                                                                                       As the sentinel on the qui vive and as the guardian of the
               of law pertaining to the scope of judicial review and the right
                                                                                     Constitution, the Supreme Court has constantly strived to
               to religion under Articles 25 and 26 have been referred to a
                                                                                     protect fundamental rights against unreasonable fetters
               nine judge bench for its consideration. The outcome thereof
                                                                                     imposed on them by the Legislature and the Executive alike
               may perhaps finally put to rest the debate on the scope of the
                                                                                     and also in safeguarding the basic fabric of the Constitution
               court's interference in religious matters.
                                                                                     from amendments which seek to erode the core and essential
                  In its path breaking judgment in M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh
                                                                                     values of our Constitution. In the process, the Supreme Court
               Das”, better known as the Ayodhya case, the Supreme Court
                                                                                     has also by way of judicial interpretation, made the Constitution
               put  to  rest  a  centuries  old  dispute,  recognising  the  right  of
                                                                                     broad-based and put life into the dry bones of a Constitution so
               the deity of Lord Ram over the property believed to be the
                                                                                     as to make it a vehicle of a nation's progress.
               birthplace. In doing so, the Court balanced the religious rights














                               Mohan Parasaran is a Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court of India.
                                In February 2013 he was appointed the Solicitor General of India and

                                 continued in this post till May 2014. Previously he held the post of
                                            Additional Solicitor General of India for nine years.









              122   70 Years of Indian Constitution
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127